Some judgments on the subject of teachers’ ability to express their political opinion have made the public confused. It has caused a controversy because it is a case of rights versus duties. The courts verdicts were also different, which made things worse. I agree that teachers need to restrain from demonstrating their political opinions. 
    First of all, it is illegal. Korean laws ban instructors from revealing political views because they are public officers. They should be free from any possible political conflicts. Article 3 of the rules of the teachers’ union indicates, “Any teachers’ union must not conduct any kind of political movement.” A similar regulation is also written in the Government Official Act. Nevertheless, they ignored it and conducted an illegal movement. The Daejeon & Incheon district courts found them guilty of a violation in February. It is natural that everyone should observe the law without exception and public educational personnel should be good role models. 
    Next, it is necessary to identify their positions clearly. Teachers have an influential job. If they do not hesitate to comment about issues, which are delicate problems in Korea, students who are taught by them may develop prejudiced perspectives. Immature students tend to accept teaching without a question like a sponge: They have the right to be educated fairly. Moreover, teachers are respected in society, and their united power has a strong influence on the general public. Students gain lots of knowledge and information at school, and their paper must be painted in a variety of colors not just one. 

    Lastly, in democratic countries people are encouraged to fulfill their duties. Farmers cultivate crops, fishermen fish, and doctors treat patients, all the members of a nation should contribute to building democracy. In the same way, teaching students is a way to fulfill their obligation. Rights always have to be accompanied by duties. Teachers strengthen educational trust and secure national competitiveness. 
    Some people insist the right to express their own opinions about any issues as a member of the society. Unlike other public officials, educational workers have a sensitive position and distinct leverage, so Korean constitutional laws have restricted their right to speak freely on politics. The courts referenced alternatives such as writing online and attending debates; instead of making collective declarations and it is good that the courts emphasized a law-abiding spirit. I hope that this controversy will push the public to cooperate in building a healthy society.  

By Lim Jae-seung, Senior
Dept. of English literature & Language